Monthly archive

September 2018 - page 4

Where Non-Price Ratings Identical, Agency Wasn’t Required to Choose Lower-Priced Offeror – SmallGovCon

in Blog by

In a best value competition, when two offerors receive identical adjectival scores on the non-price factors, one might assume that the procuring agency would be required to award the contract to the lower-priced offeror.

Not so.  In a recent bid protest decision, the GAO held that where two offerors received identical scores on three non-price factors, the agency could still elect to award the contract to the higher-priced offeror.

Source: Where Non-Price Ratings Identical, Agency Wasn’t Required to Choose Lower-Priced Offeror – SmallGovCon

Strength-Based Winning: Win More by Solutioning to Strengths | Oct. 14, 2018 (sponsored by ACT-IAC) | Philadelphia, PA | Lohfeld

in Blog by

Class date: Sun., Oct. 14, 2018  8:00 am – 4:30 pm
Class location: Philadelphia Convention Center (Sponsored by ACT-IAC as a day of training to kick off Imagine Nation – ELC 2018!!)

Note: You do not have to attend Imagine Nation – ELC 2018 or be an ACT-IAC member to attend this class!

Source: Strength-Based Winning: Win More by Solutioning to Strengths | Oct. 14, 2018 (sponsored by ACT-IAC) | Philadelphia, PA | Lohfeld

SBA OIG Recommends Improved Oversight of 8(a) Continuing Eligibility – SmallGovCon

in Blog by

Last year, we wrote about the SBA’s Office of Inspector General’s concerns with the SBA’s review of potential 8(a) participants’ eligibility. In this report, the OIG made three recommendations aimed at improving to verify applicants’ eligibility.

Just last week, the OIG released a new report analyzing the 8(a) Program. This report picks up where the earlier report left off—it addressed several issues in the SBA’s evaluation of participants’ continuing eligibility.

Source: SBA OIG Recommends Improved Oversight of 8(a) Continuing Eligibility – SmallGovCon

Recent SBA OHA Decision Offers NAICS Code Appeal Guidance – SmallGovCon

in Blog by

As we’ve noted here on SmallGovCon, appealing the assignment of a NAICS code for a solicitation is often successful. But the time frame for doing so is short, and there are other procedural limitations. Given the short deadlines and procedural hurdles, are there any signals to help identify when a NAICS code appeal might be in order?

Recently, SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals provided some guidelines in discussing the assignment of NAICS codes in the Computer Facilities Management Services, Research and Development, and Engineering Services codes.

Source: Recent SBA OHA Decision Offers NAICS Code Appeal Guidance – SmallGovCon

Companies Get Paid Multiple Times for the Same Work

in Blog by
PNWC's Government Contracting Update

Three corporations – Laserlith Corporation, Black Hills Nanosystems Corporation, and Blue Sky Engineering, Incorporated – were owned and controlled by one individual, Wallace Tang. Mr. Tang just pleaded guilty to defrauding NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), NSF (National Science Foundation), and the Energy Department through their SBIR (Small Business Innovative Research) programs and has paid about $1.1 million in restitution back to the Government.

Source: PNWC’s Government Contracting Update: Companies Get Paid Multiple Times for the Same Work

Don’t Overlook the Seemingly Perfunctory in Your Proposal: CAGE Codes – SmallGovCon

in Blog by

As our readers well know, a good proposal for a federal government procurement is an exercise in persuasive writing. You muster your creative powers to convince the source selection authority that you offer the best product or service, that your price is competitive, and that your past performance is stellar. So you invest heavily in your proposal writers; you review your proposal repeatedly to polish and ensure that it compels; you agonize.

Source: Don’t Overlook the Seemingly Perfunctory in Your Proposal: CAGE Codes – SmallGovCon

Unpaid Royalties Included in Government Contracts

in Blog by
PNWC's Government Contracting Update

Generally, royalties on a patent or amortization of the cost of purchasing a patent or patent rights necessary for the proper performance of a contract and applicable to contract products or processes are allowable.  There are some exceptions however when royalty costs are unallowable. For example, if the Government has a license or the right to a free use of the patent, the costs are unallowable. Sometimes there are situations where the patent has been adjudicated to be invalid, or  has been administratively determined to be invalid. The Government is not going to pay for royalties on invalid patents of course. Same goes for patents considered to be unenforceable or expired patents.

Source: PNWC’s Government Contracting Update: Unpaid Royalties Included in Government Contracts

What contracting changes are in the works for FAS in 2019?

in Blog by
FederalNewsRadio.com

The General Services Administration wants its agency and industry customers to know it’s listening when it comes to those popular schedules contracts. The Federal Acquisition Service nearly finished updating them to make it easier for agencies to buy things, but FAS is planning other big changes for 2019. Alan Thomas is the FAS commissioner and he spoke with Federal News Radio executive editor Jason Miller about the details on Federal Drive with Tom Temin.

Source: What contracting changes are in the works for FAS in 2019?

The 5 Pillars of Schedules Modernization | The Coalition for Government Procurement

in Blog by

The back-to-school season is upon us here in the Nation’s Capital. As local students are wrapping-up their first week of classes today, it is time to start thinking about the end of summer and the …

Source: The 5 Pillars of Schedules Modernization | The Coalition for Government Procurement

Marketing is everything – FederalNewsRadio.com

in Blog by
FederalNewsRadio.com

This week on Amtower Off Center, host Mark Amtower interviews Silicon Valley IT marketing legend Regis McKenna.

Source: Marketing is everything – FederalNewsRadio.com

Go to Top