Back in 2012, we discussed the FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation) 31.205-29 cost principle on plant protection costs (see Plant Protection Costs). While such costs are categorically allowable, we noted that the growing significance of such costs in the post 9/11 era was drawing increased scrutiny by contract auditors. At that time, the concern seemed to be one of allocation – should the cost be charged direct or indirect?
Source: PNWC’s Government Contracting Update: Plant Protection – In-House or Outsourced
New Regulation Formalizes Ombudsman Practice and Identity for IDIQ Contracts
An ‘ombudsman’ is an official charged with addressing and/or investigating the interests of individuals’ or companies’
